PMP Training Hours Change on 1 December 2026: What Still Counts
Most of the attention on this year's PMP changes has gone to the exam itself — the domain weightings, the new question formats, the shift toward business context. Those matter once you are studying. But there is a separate change with a hard date on it that affects something earlier in the process: whether your application is accepted at all.
PMI states on its own page for the updated exam: "Starting on 1 December 2026, PMI is updating PMP live training eligibility requirements."
If you already hold your 35 hours, this probably does not affect you. If you are still shopping for a course, or you have signed up for a live class that runs in December or later, it is worth ten minutes of your attention now rather than at application time.
What the rule says
The 35 hours of project management training have always been a hard prerequisite for the PMP application. What changes is who is permitted to deliver them.
From 1 December 2026, live training hours will count toward the requirement only if delivered by one of the following:
- A PMI Authorized Training Partner (ATP)
- A China Registered Education Provider (REP)
- An eligible accredited academic program
Live training from anyone else — independent instructors, consultants running their own bootcamps, corporate internal programs, or training centres that are not authorized — will not satisfy the requirement after that date.
Two qualifications on that, both of which matter more than the headline:
Self-paced training is not affected. On-demand, self-paced courses can still be delivered by any organization. The restriction applies specifically to live, instructor-led delivery. If your 35 hours came from a recorded video course, the change does not touch you.
Training completed before the date remains eligible. Hours you have already earned stay valid under the rules in force when you earned them. This is not retroactive. The question is only about live courses you take from 1 December 2026 onward.
Why this is an application problem, not a study problem
The 35 hours are an eligibility document. When you fill in the application, you name the provider, the course, and the dates. PMI can audit that claim, and applications are selected for audit at random as well as for cause.
The failure mode this rule creates is a quiet one. You take a live course in December from a good instructor who is not an ATP, you learn the material perfectly well, you pass the exam in your head — and then your application stalls because the hours do not qualify. You have lost the course fee and, more expensively, the time.
That is worth stating plainly because the training market is not uniformly careful about this. Course listings are written to sell seats, and a provider who has not sorted out authorization has no incentive to lead with that fact. The check is yours to make.
How to check before you pay
Before booking any live course that runs on or after 1 December 2026, confirm three things:
- Is the provider an ATP? PMI maintains a directory of Authorized Training Partners. Look the organization up there rather than trusting a badge image on a sales page. Authorization can lapse, and logos outlive it.
- Is this specific course the authorized one? A provider can be an ATP and also sell courses outside that scope. Ask which of their offerings carries the authorization.
- Is the delivery mode live or self-paced? If it is self-paced, the restriction does not apply and the provider's status is a quality question rather than an eligibility question.
If a provider will not answer these directly in writing, that is itself the answer.
What to do depending on where you are
You already have 35 hours. Nothing to do. Keep the completion certificate, the provider name, and the dates somewhere you can find them, because that is what an audit asks for.
You are mid-course and it finishes before 1 December 2026. Finish it. Hours completed before the date remain eligible.
You are choosing a course now. If you prefer live instruction, choose an ATP and you are covered on both sides of the date. If cost is the constraint, a self-paced course from any provider still satisfies the requirement and will continue to.
You have a live course booked for December or later with a non-authorized provider. Ask the provider directly whether they will hold ATP status by the delivery date. If the answer is no or vague, either move to an authorized provider or take the course for its teaching value and source your 35 hours separately from a self-paced option.
The other eligibility changes worth knowing
The training-provider rule arrived alongside two changes that work in candidates' favour, and they are easy to miss because they are less dramatic.
The experience window widened from eight years to ten. Qualifying project experience must fall within the last ten years, where the previous rule looked back eight. For anyone who led projects earlier in their career and then moved into a role with a different title, this can bring otherwise-expired experience back inside the window. If you looked at the PMP a few years ago and concluded you were short on hours, the arithmetic may have changed.
Eligibility now recognizes apprenticeships and advanced technical or vocational programs. PMI describes the update as expanding eligibility to apprenticeships and training. The practical effect is that the education ladder is no longer only secondary school and university degrees — vocational and technical qualifications now have a place on it.
The long-standing tiers are unchanged in their familiar form: with a four-year degree, 36 months of project leadership experience; with a secondary school diploma, 60 months. Reporting on how the new vocational pathway maps onto experience requirements is not consistent across prep sites, and it is not spelled out on PMI's own summary page. If your route depends on it, read the current PMP Handbook or ask PMI rather than taking a prep vendor's table at face value. That advice holds generally for eligibility questions: application rules are the one area where a secondhand summary is not good enough, because the cost of getting it wrong lands on you at audit.
The short version
If your 35 hours are banked, or you are taking a self-paced course, nothing changes. If you are planning to sit in a live classroom — physical or virtual — from 1 December 2026, check that the provider is an ATP, a China REP, or an accredited academic program before you pay. And if you dismissed the PMP some years back because your project experience had aged out, the ten-year window is reason enough to run the numbers again.